← back to data room
hot juice
financials / private + confidential
the five-year plan

The agency proves it.
The ecosystem scales it.

year one is the agency: three months in, with a projected run-rate of $1.3M amortized, building toward a $1.6M year-one agency target we are a couple of clients away from. then the big bets stack on top as the raise funds the infrastructure.
$31M
year-five revenue
$12M
year-five ebitda
40%
year-five margin
$1.6M
year-one agency target
$2M to $31M in five years
$0M$10M$20M$30M$2Myr1$6Myr2$13Myr3$22Myr4$31Myr5
agencyclubhouses / studiosowned ip + equitymembership
$ in millionsyr1yr2yr3yr4yr5
agency (retainers, production, events)1.604.507.8011.0014.50
creator clubhouses / studios0.001.003.005.508.00
owned ip + platform equity0.000.602.204.507.50
membership circle0.000.100.400.801.20
total revenue1.606.2013.4021.8031.20
ebitda0.431.864.618.2112.46
ebitda margin27%30%34%38%40%

How to read this

The agency is the floor, not the ceiling. Retainers, production, and events are all inside the agency line, because that is what we actually sell today. It is the repeatable engine, and it is already transacting. We run it at honest pod-model margins of 27 to 33 percent, built on client-facing people supported by offshore depth and AI agents our own team built, not a bloated in-house team. That efficiency is why the margin holds as we scale.

The ecosystem is the upside. Creator clubhouses and studios (partner-funded, the kind the Roblox CEO described wanting worldwide), owned IP and platform equity (micro dramas, documentaries, features, and equity seats in platforms like the one we are building with bumpp), and an invite-only membership circle. These stack on top starting year two, as the raise funds the infrastructure, and they carry blended margins up because owned IP and equity are higher-margin than services.

By year five the agency is still roughly $14m, but it is 46 percent of the business rather than all of it. That is the point: the agency proves the model and funds the build, the ecosystem is where the value compounds.

the full working model / 8 tabs, bottom-up monthly build, phased raise
download the model (excel)
The exit. Creator-media and studio assets trade at roughly 8 to 12x EBITDA. On year-five EBITDA of $12.5m, that implies an enterprise value of roughly $100m to $150m, with a first exit window opening in year three to four. Owned IP and platform equity are upside to that range, not baked into it. Our goal is to build valuable assets and exit, and each engine is structured to stand on its own.
hot juice studios / financials / private + confidential / not for distribution
projections are management estimates, built bottom-up and anchored to signed run-rate